One Astronomer's Noise

Entries from February 2009

URSI Update #3 – SETI

February 5, 2009 · 5 Comments

Since it’s been a month since my conference, I think that this will be the last in my series of round-ups from the National Radio Sciences Meeting in Boulder last month. And this time, I’m going to stray away from mainstream science into something slightly out there but totally cool – the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, or SETI.

There were two sessions dealing with new telescopes, techniques and observations. My talk on our epoch of reionization experiment* fit into the afternoon session of the first day. I got to shake off my nerves during a short coffee break, and we returned to hear a series of talks on SETI research. Joshua Von Korff from Berkeley gave the first talk on Astropulse, a project that is searching for all kinds of radio pulses with millisecond and even microsecond time resolution. This has a number of applications from evaporating black holes to rotating radio transients, giant pulses from pulsars to ET itself. Finding a pulse of radiation is not as simple as it seems, however. The interstellar medium (ISM), or the gas and dust that resides in the space between the stars, has refractive properties, meaning that it can “slow down” light. The measure of the refractive property is dependent on frequency of light that is being studied. So, if something gives off a pulse of radio radiation, that pulse will arrive at different times depending on what frequency that you are looking at. If you are using a broadband system, meaning you are looking at a wide swath of frequencies all at once, you may miss the pulse completely!


An example of dispersion measure for a pulsar. From the Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy by Lorimer and Kramer, explained in “Essential Radio Astronomy” by Condon and Ransom.

To find a pulse, you must guess for a wide range of dispersion measures relating to the properties of the ISM and the distance to your object, for an object that you haven’t even found yet! As you can imagine, this takes a lot of computing power. Pulsar astronomers are used to this fact, and so are SETI researchers. Many people are familiar with one solution to the computing problem, SETI@Home. This makes use of the personal computers of millions of users to comb through data from a radio telescope, searching for pulses that may indicate an extraterrestrial civilization, or one of the other cool transient phenomena that are formed naturally in our universe.


SETI@Home screenshot… my laptop looked like this a lot in college!

Next, Andrew Siemion, also from Berkeley, talked about another approach to radio SETI called “Fly’s Eye.” This uses the (mostly) privately funded Allen Telescope Array, or ATA, as a wide field of view survey instrument. In fact, each of its 42 currently working antennas points in a different direction in order to see 150 square degrees of the sky at a time. So it is like the eye of a fly, which is multi-faceted and thus has a large field of view, making them notorious hard to swat! Fly’s Eye has seen approximately 100 “events” to date, most of which were human-made signals, and at least one of which was a giant pulse from the Crab pulsar. Later in the session we heard from William Barott from Embry-Riddle about the digital backend of the ATA. The observatory at Hat Creek has multiple instruments on the backend, depending on the type of science that is being done. The racks of equipment and bright blue XAUI cables reminded me fondly of our own instrument in Green Bank, since we are using the same technology from the same group in Berkeley.

A real treat for me was listening to Jill Tarter speak about SETI. The previous talks were heavily weighted towards the instrumentation, but she delved into the SETI science and reasons for these surveys. Plus, I had seen her on a few Discovery Channel and other such specials, and I’m always amazed and energized by her explanations and motivation. You may think of her as the “real-life Ellie Arroway” if you are a Contact fan. What struck me the most from her talk was the real need that was expressed for surveys like Fly’s Eye and Astropulse. On the one hand, we’ve been looking for extraterrestrial signals since Frank Drake’s Project Ozma in Green Bank in 1960, and so far, nada. However, our radio telescopes started out more crudely and have been getting better and more sensitive with time. Thus, making some assumptions about a possible ET’s transmitting radio power, all the radio SETI searches to date have probed a region of the galaxy only a hundred or so light years across. Remember our galaxy is “a hundred thousand light years side-to-side,” so that’s an itty-bitty fraction! The ATA hopes to greatly expand that physical search space along with more frequency coverage and with greater sensitivity.


Search space of the ATA in the Milky Way, in comparison to Project Phoenix

Some searches are not unbiased scans of the sky. We know of one instance of life, ourselves. Since we aren’t finding habitable planets just yet, we can at least target sun-like stars. Some SETI searches will target those, while others will target stars that have been found to have exoplanets. Others will try a deep search of the Galactic Plane, the most likely part of the sky from which a signal will come. Some projects look for Dyson spheres in the infrared, while others will look for optical transmissions from other civilizations. The point is that there is a huge search space to explore, and we’ve only just begun. It makes me happy to know that someone, somewhere is keeping an eye out for that possible signal, even if the chances of ever receiving it are so small. Wouldn’t it be so fascinating and touch every part of our culture to learn that we are not alone?

* More about the project is forthcoming, I promise! But I talk a little about the science case here.

Categories: astronomy · science
Tagged: , ,

Astronomy History and Moving Forward

February 4, 2009 · 1 Comment

Still reeling from the lack of sleep and a generally really weird day, but there are a couple of things I wanted to “get off my chest” so to speak.

First, this year marks the 50th anniversary of the NRAO summer student program. Way before the National Science Foundation started their Research Experiences for Undergraduates, the National Radio Astronomy Observatory was training students to become future radio astronomers! I consider myself fortunate to have been a part of that program three times, once under the REU guise and twice as a graduate researcher. One thing that I quite clearly remember from my time there* was the impressive number of current NRAO researchers or other radio astronomers that had themselves been through the program. Go and read some of their fascinating stories! What isn’t mentioned in Kevin Marvel’s bio is the best prank ever

Also, the International Year of Astronomy site tells you how YOU can help spread the word of astronomy, no matter what your background**. So check it out and get involved!

* Other than this and this… I miss you guys!
** I half expected the graduate student section say, “Stop procrastinating and get back to your thesis!”

Categories: astronomy
Tagged: , ,

The Exoplanets keep rolling in… now a Super-Earth?

February 3, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Early this morning, US Eastern time, I was waiting in my cold apartment for an electrician to fix my power and thus my heat. So, a planet with a surface temperature around 1000 degrees wouldn’t seem to bad! That is in fact what was announced this morning from the CoRoT team. This planet is estimated to be 1.7 times the size* of Earth. I didn’t think I’d be saying that already! Is it possible that we are pushing down to the level of terrestrial planets? Though completely uninhabitable by humans, this discovery would highlight the sensitivity of exoplanet detection methods. Daniel Fischer has been tweeting about it, which is where I first heard of this. SarahAskew is also talking about it, and you can read more from the European Space Agency.

To be honest, the news is a little stunning, and I’d like to see the paper on this. I’ll be keeping an eye on astro-ph!

*Edit: I think it was radius, not mass. Whoops!

Categories: astronomy
Tagged:

What is a Skeptic?

February 1, 2009 · 1 Comment

Cross-post from Charlottesville Skeptics blog!

There’s been some discussion on the email list about the name of our group, and I’d like to throw in my two cents here.

To say that someone is a skeptic does not say much about that person’s religious beliefs, or lack thereof. In fact, it may be that religion is the farthest thing from that person’s mind. As an atheist, I lack belief in a god or gods. But that can be a pretty boring topic of conversation time and time again. Morally, I align myself with much of secular humanism, but I’d rather do good things than talk about what is good. No, I was never so great at philosophy.

Skepticism, for me, is a whole other ball game. To be a skeptic is to challenge and question everything, whether it be belief in a god, talking to ghosts, alternative medicine, or a new product that is being sold on a television commercial. Every person uses a bit of skepticism when making every day decisions, and everyone can stand to use a bit more. For this reason, I think that to be a skeptic is the most practical way to be, and that skepticism is actually the most inclusive term. Anyone can apply observation and critical thinking skills to a problem, even if it does take time to hone those skills. A person armed with a “baloney detection kit” at all times is acting as a skeptic. Most of us will have our skeptical alarm bells set off if a stranger in a parking lot offers to hold our purse while we load groceries into our car. My skeptical alarm will surely sound whenever I hear a claim for diet pills or magnetic therapy. Most people will balk if you tell them that the Virgin Mary appeared on your grilled cheese sandwich. Skeptics are the ones with the answer when someone asks, “What’s the harm in believing?”

Skeptics aren’t just curmudgeonly naysayers, either. Most that I’ve met have a deep appreciation for science, and the wonderful ways in which our universe works. For them, reality is enough to explore. There is no need for the “supernatural.” Look at all the fabulous things we can learn through evidence and reason! For example, every atom in your body, that is not hydrogen or helium, was formed in the core of a massive star many billions of years ago, or in the explosive aftermath that marked its death, called a supernova. In the words of one of the greatest skeptics of the modern age, and one of my personal heroes, Carl Sagan, “The Earth and every living thing are made of star stuff.” I highly recommend Sagan’s Demon Haunted World to anyone for an introduction into Sagan’s thought processes, and I have a copy that is available to borrow!

So, I guess that’s why I’m happy with the name Skeptics’ Group, or Skeptics’ Society, or CVille Skeptics, or Skeptical Badasses, whatever sounds coolest. It’s a positive way of saying, “we’re a thinking bunch of people, and nothing is safe from our rational approach to life!”

I’d also encourage you to check out a longer article, “What is Skepticism?” by Sam Ogden over at Skepchick. It talks abut skepticism as a handy-dandy toolkit for investigating claims, whether it be everyday or not-so-ordinary, and how it is like “science express.”

Categories: skeptic
Tagged: , ,