One Astronomer's Noise

Entries from September 2008

Seeing Black Holes

September 4, 2008 · 5 Comments

This press release came out yesterday that was SO EXCITING to me that I was bouncing up and down. In today’s Nature, astronomers write about the successful attempt to resolve the supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy using 1.3 mm VLBI. And now you are going, “huh? jargon say what?”

As most people now know, black holes are supremely dense objects. The gravitational field around them is so strong, they can severely warp space around them, and nothing, not even light, is fast enough to escape its gravitational pull once inside a certain radius. It is a weird concept, since it has essentially infinite density at a single point in space, yet we do find evidence that these things exist. For example, we can watch the orbits of stars around the very center of our Milky Way galaxy, and determine the mass of the dark object that lives there. It has so much mass in such a small area, that physics has no other explanation for what it could be, and any other explanation would be even weirder. Around some black holes, we can measure the orbits of gas, and measure the mass and limit the size.

Want to visualize where this is? If you look up towards the Southern sky (if you are in the Northern Hemisphere) towards the constellation Sagittarius the hunter, or teapot, and you are at a dark site, then you can look right at the center of the Milky Way galaxy, that band of light that stretches across the sky.


Image from here with caption: “The supermassive black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy lies behind dense clouds of gas and dust. The center of the galaxy is a little above the “spout” of the teapot-shaped constellation Sagittarius at the upper right of this photograph.”

Remember, this is at the very center of the hustle and bustle of our Milky Way, whereas we are way out, 27,000 light years away, in some backwater spiral arm!

Astronomers want to actually measure the size of these black holes in order to test the theories. Although a black hole by definition gives off no light, the gas swirling around and into it does, giving off radiation at many wavelengths from the radio through the optical and into the x-ray. The Hubble telescope has shown us that supermassive (or millions of times the mass of our sun) black holes exist in the center of almost every galaxy that has a “bulge” in the center. The center, or bulge, of our Milky Way is not easily viewed by us in visible light since we have to look through the plane of the galaxy in order to see it, and there’s lots of attenuating dust in the way. But we can see signs of our black hole, dubbed Sgr A*, in the infrared, radio, and x-ray. In order to see something as tiny (at this distance) as the black hole, you need a big, big telescope.

Enter VLBI, or Very Long Baseline Interferometry. This is a technique by which you link up multiple telescopes across long distances, either in real-time or later in a computer, in order to make one giant telescope. The telescope formed from this can be as big as the Earth! It isn’t a very sensitive telescope, but it has very good angular resolution, meaning it can see very tiny, tiny things. In this study, they achieved a resolution of “37 micro-arcseconds – the equivalent of a baseball seen on the surface of the moon, 240,000 miles distant,” by linking up telescopes in Hawaii, Arizona, and California. The light that they were tuned to has a wavelength of 1.3 mm, so this can also be called “millimeter wave interferometry.”

So, go ahead and read the press release for more information on what they found and what theory they are testing. In summary, they were able to detect the structure and size of things around the black hole, thus squeezing in to see how small the black hole really is. But there is more work to be done! “Future investigations will help answer the question of what, precisely, they are seeing: a glowing corona around the black hole, an orbiting “hot spot,” or a jet of material.”

Other than the fact that this is really cool science, I was personally excited about this since I learned all about these experiments back in 2003 when I was at MIT Haystack Observatory for a summer internship. I’m really glad to see that the team is succeeding in their goal after years of hard work.

Sheperd S. Doeleman, Jonathan Weintroub, Alan E. E. Rogers, Richard Plambeck, Robert Freund, Remo P. J. Tilanus, Per Friberg, Lucy M. Ziurys, James M. Moran, Brian Corey, Ken H. Young, Daniel L. Smythe, Michael Titus, Daniel P. Marrone, Roger J. Cappallo, Douglas C.-J. Bock, Geoffrey C. Bower, Richard Chamberlin, Gary R. Davis, Thomas P. Krichbaum, James Lamb, Holly Maness, Arthur E. Niell, Alan Roy, Peter Strittmatter, Daniel Werthimer, Alan R. Whitney, David Woody (2008). Event-horizon-scale structure in the supermassive black hole candidate at the Galactic Centre Nature, 455 (7209), 78-80 DOI: 10.1038/nature07245

Categories: astronomy
Tagged: ,

Palin-mania

September 3, 2008 · 3 Comments

So with the recent announcement of Sarah Palin as John McCain’s running mate, the media and new media have been running wild on her history, background, views, and anything else they can dig up. Some things in particular stick out in my mind.

To start off, I disagree with John McCain’s foreign policy stance. Frankly, it scares me a little bit. However, not too much else on his platform is all that terrifying, although his recent switch to a pro-life stance is disheartening. Palin, however, is a bit scarier. She has spoken in favor of creationism in the science classroom and is not afraid to condemn abortion and gay marriage, as reported by Brother Richard at Life Without Faith and the Bad Astronomer. PZ Myers does a good job of finding this video of her speaking at her church. She clearly ties God’s will to the economic and educational status of her home state of Alaska. That’s a little strange to me, but she’s advocating hard work as well as praying. She scares me at about 3:40 where she claims that God’s plan has led us to Iraq. Uuuuuuggggghhhh! This kind of speech may bring in the religious evangelicals that I had hoped would reject McCain. So if he’s elected, and something happens to him, this country will be directed by Jesus’s supposed will again? (See later parts of the video.)

But, on the lighter side, she helps to further the joke that McCain looks uncannily like Col. Tigh from Battlestar Galactica, taking the place of Laura Roslin. Okay, so I’ve been a bit anti-Roslin as of the last season and a half or so, but I’d still rather have her as President than Palin!

Weeeeiiiirrrrd!

Categories: general
Tagged: , ,

The Economics of Woo

September 3, 2008 · Leave a Comment

This great article was sent to me by Seth, thanks! The title was very catching to me, “The X-Files: Economics Edition,” posted over at Freakonomics.

The article reports on the author’s attempt at an economical analysis of the UFO and Bigfoot phenomena, which is entertaining and informative. He starts with any good empirical scientist’s first step, plot everything against everything else. There seems to be a correlation between the number of UFO sightings and Bigfoot sightings with time, although it’s not clear how reliable the counts are. He claims that the relationship is “strong and positive”. Maybe to an x-ray astronomer.* The data goes on to tell that the top six sighting states for both phenomena are the same. Unless you want to believe** that Bigfoot incites UFOs or vice versa, it seems to me that this correlation is indicative that paranormal phenomena have places and time periods of popularity. But I encourage you to read the author’s enlightening analysis, rather than my own rambling. The actual economics kicks in at the end, with the note that many UFO and Bigfoot sighting “hotspots” bring tourism, which may encourage the locals to “see” these things more frequently. It’s a reasonable hypothesis that would warrant quite a study!

I know a bit about the economic side, personally. In 2004, we (the rocking summer students in Socorro) stopped by Roswell on the way back from an observatory trip to visit the UFO Museum and Research Center. Hey, it was free admission! However, I have to admit, I just HAD to buy a “Roswell” shot glass. I, too, am a victim of UFO tourism.

*Okay that was MEAN, sorry dear!
** Slight pun

Categories: skeptic
Tagged: ,

The horror of honour killings

September 2, 2008 · Leave a Comment

CNN recently posted an article about the brutal honor killings in Pakistan of 5 women. Although saddened and enraged by the tragedy, I was a little bit hopeful that investigations had actually been opened and that a major news network was reporting on it. I had already heard of the story through the International Campaign Against Honour Killings email list back on August 14. The email tells more of the story:

According to the information received, five women were Ms. Fatima, wife of Umeed Ali Umrani, Jannat Bibi, wife of Qaiser Khan, Fauzia, daughter of Ata Mohammad Umrani, and two other girls, aged between 16 to 18 years. They were at the house of Mr. Chandio at Baba Kot village and to leave for a civil court at Usta Mohammad, district Jafarabad, so that three of the girls could marry the men of their choice. Their decision to have marriage in court was the result of several days of discussions with the elders of the tribe who refused them permission to marry. The names of two younger girls were not ascertained because of strong control of tribal leaders in the area.

As the news of their plans leaked out, Mr. Abdul Sattar Umrani, a brother of the minister, came with more than six persons and abducted them at gun points. They were taken in a Land Cruiser jeep, bearing a registration number plate of the Balochistan government, to another remote area, Nau Abadi, in the vicinity of Baba Kot. After reaching the deserted area of Nau Abadi, Abdul Sattar Umrani and his six companions took the three younger women out of the jeep and beat them before allegedly opening fire with their guns. The girls were seriously injured but were still alive at that moment. Sattar Umrani and his accomplices hurled them into a wide ditch and covered them with earth and stones. The two older women were an aunt of Fauzia and the other, the mother of one minor. When they protested and tried to stop the burial of the minors that were plainly alive, the attackers were so angry that they also pushed them into the ditch and buried all alive. After completing the burial, they fired several shots into to the air so that no one would come close.

The minors were educated and were studying in classes from 10 to 12. They were punished for trying to decide about their marriages.

The website provides more details on how to contact authorities or interested parties, urging them to try and convict the murderers. Too many of these crimes go unpunished, and that needs to stop, regardless of barbaric religious or cultural views. Women are treated like chattel, and that is unacceptable. It is very, very difficult to read through the blog, but maybe these action alerts are doing some good.

Categories: general
Tagged:

Oh, Jorge Cham gets it right AGAIN!

September 2, 2008 · 1 Comment

Welcome to my life…

Categories: fun
Tagged:

Educating the Mind

September 1, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Some cool education articles that popped up on Skepchick today. First, “The Secret to Raising Smart Kids,” which focuses on praising kids for their effort, rather than their intelligence. The writer cites numerous studies in which this works to improve the students’ performance.

Our society worships talent, and many people assume that possessing superior intelligence or ability—along with confidence in that ability—is a recipe for success. In fact, however, more than 30 years of scientific investigation suggests that an overemphasis on intellect or talent leaves people vulnerable to failure, fearful of challenges and unwilling to remedy their shortcomings.

…[O]ur studies show that teaching people to have a “growth mind-set,” which encourages a focus on effort rather than on intelligence or talent, helps make them into high achievers in school and in life.

I’m afraid to admit that I learned this the hard way, when my studies stopped being “easy” to me, and I had to rely on hard work and perseverance in order to understand a concept or get a project done. It’s something that our professors and advisors now try to instill into us, that scientists aren’t necessarily super smart, but they are diligent. In education, it is also important to encourage kids no matter what their talent is. It seems as though the default position has become to praise children for being themselves and never “hurting” them with things like bad grades or red pens. Instead of treating kids as if they have fragile egos or as if they have a mysterious talent, praise their work and effort and successes.

The next piece of news has Adam Savage commenting on science education. And before you say, “but he’s not a scientist!” note that the Mythbusters are responsible for teaching the scientific method to scores of lay people. His three points are: let students get their hands dirty, spend money on science (in the classroom), and celebrate mistakes. The third one ties back into the previous article, just a bit.

Science is dirty, tedious, and fun, all at the same time!

Categories: education · science