<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hitchens-Turek Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noisyastronomer.com/2008/09/11/the-hitchens-turek-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noisyastronomer.com/2008/09/11/the-hitchens-turek-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greywolf</title>
		<link>http://noisyastronomer.com/2008/09/11/the-hitchens-turek-debate/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Greywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astronoise.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/the-hitchens-turek-debate/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Nicole, thank you very much for putting together such an informed and only slightly biased in-depth report on the Hitchens-Turek debate.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I blog on a site called Christopher Hitchens Watch, which is devoted to  what my confederates and I refer to as &quot;the Glorious Hitch Hunt&quot;, and which takes a critical and fairly lighthearted look at Hitchens&#039;s work. Looking around for some info on the debate, I came across your post on Life Without Faith and judged it by far the best account of the debate currently available. So I &#039;ve taken the liberty of writing up a post of my own that quotes liberally from yours and also includes a link back to it. I hope you don&#039;t think I&#039;ve been over-liberal because I think what you wrote deserves to be as widely read as possible.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://christopherhitchenswatch.blogspot.com/&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I doubt whether this subject will capture a lot of attention on our blog, as Hitch has been &quot;debating&quot; religious types regularly for over a year now and the phenomenon of both sides talking past each other and refusing to engage has been in evidence from the start.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On the subject of morality, like your correspondent Ajita Kamal, I unreservedly recommend Robert Wright&#039;s &lt;em&gt;The Moral Animal&lt;/em&gt;, which takes episodes from the life of Charles Darwin to illustrate and explore human moral sensibilities. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I envy you being able to work in astronomy as it has always been my favorite science, and I wish you a long and successful career in the field.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yours agnostically!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Tim Groves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicole, thank you very much for putting together such an informed and only slightly biased in-depth report on the Hitchens-Turek debate.</p>
<p>I blog on a site called Christopher Hitchens Watch, which is devoted to  what my confederates and I refer to as &#8220;the Glorious Hitch Hunt&#8221;, and which takes a critical and fairly lighthearted look at Hitchens&#8217;s work. Looking around for some info on the debate, I came across your post on Life Without Faith and judged it by far the best account of the debate currently available. So I &#8216;ve taken the liberty of writing up a post of my own that quotes liberally from yours and also includes a link back to it. I hope you don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve been over-liberal because I think what you wrote deserves to be as widely read as possible.</p>
<p><a href="http://christopherhitchenswatch.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://christopherhitchenswatch.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>I doubt whether this subject will capture a lot of attention on our blog, as Hitch has been &#8220;debating&#8221; religious types regularly for over a year now and the phenomenon of both sides talking past each other and refusing to engage has been in evidence from the start.</p>
<p>On the subject of morality, like your correspondent Ajita Kamal, I unreservedly recommend Robert Wright&#8217;s <em>The Moral Animal</em>, which takes episodes from the life of Charles Darwin to illustrate and explore human moral sensibilities. </p>
<p>I envy you being able to work in astronomy as it has always been my favorite science, and I wish you a long and successful career in the field.</p>
<p>Yours agnostically!</p>
<p>Tim Groves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://noisyastronomer.com/2008/09/11/the-hitchens-turek-debate/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astronoise.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/the-hitchens-turek-debate/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Bravo, Nicole!  I was abroad last week and missed the debate - kudos to you for posting this summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo, Nicole!  I was abroad last week and missed the debate &#8211; kudos to you for posting this summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

